Gonzaga, https://brightwomen.net/da/guyanesiske-kvinder/ G. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you will Peoples Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The area regarding attachment inside peoples mating. Review of Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Web sites paradox revisited. Diary from Personal Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites paradox: A personal technical one to reduces social wedding and emotional really-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Meters., & Sphere, J. Meters. (2001). Count, timing, and you will time of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Latest People Profile, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data out-of intimacy, hobbies, and partnership: Comparison the newest presumptions of your triangular idea away from like. Mental Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Perception best throughout the creating even worse: Personal evaluations in this personal relationship. Diary of Identity and Personal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: New implicit cognition of personal competition. Diary out-of Identification and you will Public Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
A great. (2001)mitment and you may relationship maintenance systems
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you can glamorous alternatives: The fresh new changed psychology out-of dating restoration. Progression and you may Peoples Choices, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential analysis regarding disagreement and accord in the disturb and nondistressed relationship partners. Log out of Contacting and you may Scientific Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An effective., Eco-friendly, Good. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Matchmaking creation online: What’s the big appeal? Record away from Societal Affairs, 58(1), 9–31.
The great benefits of positive illusions: Idealization as well as the structure off satisfaction in personal dating
Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-investigations aim into the intimate matchmaking: A type of global improvement and certain verification. When you look at the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Insights ents regarding examination of few telecommunications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge College Force.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-counselor bond from the contact away from accessory theory. Psychotherapy: Theory, Look, Practice, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new personal monitoring program: Increased awareness so you can personal signs once the a transformative reaction to social exception. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest social outcast: Ostracism, personal difference, getting rejected, and intimidation (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Therapy Press.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Internationally and certain relational activities on contact with personal relationships. Log from Personality and you may Public Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you will advice trying in the close relationship. Identification and Societal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and specific attachment representations inside the adulthood: Will there be a relationship?. Diary Out-of Personal And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate close dating: Fix and you may improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection individually perception certainly partners since the a function of the fresh new similarity within their mutual skills. Identification And you can Public Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience of extrinsic rewards towards the preference and enjoying. Log of Character and you will Public Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.